Myth: Abortion laws were of rather
recent origin, and were adopted to protect women from dangerous
surgery, not to protect unborn children.
Reality: Throughout almost all stages
of history in nations influenced by Christianity, and in other
nations as well, abortion has been strongly condemned by the
religious and political leadership of these nations.
In early American
history, states usually did not pass criminal statutes; rather, they
relied upon the body of common law that our Founding Fathers brought
to us from England.
It is true that, at least
in some periods, the common law made abortion a crime only after
quickening, that is, after the mother could feel the child move in
the womb. Sir William Blackstone called abortion after quickening "a
very heinous misdemeanor," and we should note that at that time any
noncapital crime was considered a misdemeanor. However, this does
not mean the common law considered the life of the unborn child
unworthy of protection before quickening. Rather the reason had to
do with proving the elements of a crime. Let me explain what I mean:
Suppose John resolves to
kill Mary as she sleeps in her bed, so he enters her bedroom and
fires three shots into her back. Unbeknown to John, however, Mary
was already dead; she had died three hours earlier of a heart
attack. Is John guilty of murder? No; under the common law, one
cannot murder a person who is already dead. To convict John of
murder, the prosecutor had to prove that Mary was alive at the time
John fired the shots into her back.
Now let’s transfer that
principle to the abortion situation. To convict a person of killing
an unborn child by abortion, the prosecution had to prove that the
unborn child was alive at the time of the abortion. And given the
state of medical technology at the time the common law was
developed, it was virtually impossible to prove beyond a reasonable
doubt that the unborn child was alive, or even that the mother was
pregnant, until the mother could feel the child move within her.
During the 1800s,
advanced medical knowledge enabled the doctors to determine the
child was alive prior to quickening. In 1859 the American Medical
Association unanimously adopted the AMA Report on Criminal
Abortion. The report condemned abortion and stated one reason
abortions took place was "wide-spread popular ignorance of the true
character of the crime—a belief, even among mothers themselves, that
the foetus is not alive till after the period of quickening."
Another reason, the Report stated, was the "grave defects of our
laws, both common and statute, as regards the independent and actual
existence of the child before birth, as a living being." The Report
continued, "With strange inconsistency, the law fully acknowledges
the foetus in utero and its inherent rights, for civil purposes;
while personally and as criminally affected, it fails to recognize
it, and to its life as yet denies all protection." Abortion, it
stated, was "no simple offence against public morality and decency,
no mere misdemeanor, no attempt upon the life of the mother, but the
wanton and murderous destruction of her child." Declaring that
"physicians have long been united in condemning the act of producing
abortion, at every period of gestation, except as necessary for
preserving the life of either mother or child," the AMA Report
called upon state legislatures to make abortion at all stages of
gestation a criminal offense.
In response, during the
1860s many state legislatures adopted laws that made abortion a
criminal offense at any stage of pregnancy, except when necessary to
save the life of the mother or child. And the strained explanation
that these laws were passed to protect mothers from dangerous
surgery, just doesn’t make sense. All surgery was dangerous in those
days; but we don’t see the passage of laws prohibiting
appendectomies or tonsillectomies. And Iowa’s 1868 abortion statute
was titled "An Act to Prohibit Foeticide," that is, the act to
prohibit the killing of a fetus. Courts have regularly held that the
title of a statute is evidence of its purpose, meaning, and
construction.
The lesson of history is
clear: The common law has never recognized a right to abortion.
Quite the contrary, the common law criminalized abortion after
quickening, and the prohibition was extended to babies before
quickening as soon as the technology was available to prove to a
court that the pre-quickened baby was alive.